Directed by Zack
Snyder
This review of Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice will
not be the mammoth dissection that was my review of Man of Steel three years ago [LINK]. This is just going to be a
short statement of my own impressions, with no intent to argue or justify my
points. What would be the purpose? The critics have spoken, and as happened
with John Carter and Green Lantern both, what may have begun
as legitimate criticisms seems to have started feeding on themselves as critics
seem more interested now in outdoing their peers in showing how clever can be
their criticisms than in providing reasoned analysis and evaluation. The
audience seems to have received the movie more kindly. For what it’s worth, the
Rotten Tomatoes scores are quite divergent (approximately 28/72), far more so
than for Man of Steel (approximately
56/76). (I found it really interesting last week how the initial critics’
assessments were quite a bit more in line with Man of Steel than the ones that started coming out later – when the
later critics had had time to figure out which way the wind was blowing and the
piling-on had time to begin.) Don’t
get me wrong. This is obviously not a movie for everyone, and it is a movie
that does have its shortcomings, particularly an uneven pacing as well as a couple of things highlighted below. It is ultimately, I
believe, less a movie for general audiences than it was a movie for me and someone like me – a life-long comic-book fan with a deep love for these characters (one
I do not have for the Marvel Universe, which means I admittedly approach those
movies with a degree of objectivity that is not possible for me in this case).
I can easily see how someone who does not have that love – and the innate
knowledge of myriad story-lines and images accumulated over fifty years of
reading DC Comics – would be left cold by it. All I can ultimately say is that
I enjoyed BVS:DOJ very much and look forward to seeing future
installments in the DC Movie Universe that is emerging from what I consider to
have been a similarly – albeit not to the same degree -- maligned Man of Steel.
The first most
critical thing I would say right now is that I myself would not have gone this
route for a second Superman film. I
set forth my thoughts on what the follow-up to Man of Steel should be at the end of the aforementioned review, and
I stand by what I said then. Most importantly, I would not have introduced Batman as an adversary of Superman’s. However,
given that the producers had different ideas, I think they pulled off the
build-up to the confrontation fairly well, giving Bruce Wayne a believable
remote motivation in his street-level view of the war between Superman and Zod
and the human cost of what we saw three years ago. But then to build on that by
making Batman a patsy of Lex Luthor’s? That is almost as wrong-headed as the
casting of Jesse Eisenberg as a Lex who comes off as a cheap, evil imitation of
Tony Stark.
Jesse Eisenberg.
Is. Not. Lex Luthor. That was easily
the worst element in this movie.
For me, although I
do have problems with the way Batman’s character was used in the overall story,
I consider Ben Affleck’s interpretation of the character, both as a middle-aged
Bruce Wayne and as a war-weary Batman, the best part of the move. And kudos to
costuming, effects, and the choreography of his fighting normal human thugs
(which was, I thought, more visually effective than his armored slug-fest with
Superman) – after seventy-plus years of trying, somebody finally got it right.
I feel like I have finally seen the Batman that I imagined all my life from the
static images of the comic book page explode into real life action. I could say
much the same for Gal Gadot’s Wonder Woman. Awesome.
I haven’t really
processed much else in this movie – it usually takes me time to do so. And I
definitely have not untangled all of the, very possibly overused,
dream-sequences and hallucinations. I don’t think it’s really possible to do so
at this time. I am near certain much of that will be more easily understandable
several movies on down the line, because I think one thing is clear about this
movie. It is not meant to stand alone but is rather far more akin to a first
(or second) issue in a saga that will play out over time and be far more
integrally related and meaningfully cross-referential than the Marvel movies
have been. I don’t necessarily think that that’s a good thing for your casual
movie-goer, whose interest and patience for the unfolding multi-movie epic is
probably not sustainable, but for me – and others who love the long-form serial
story-telling of the comics medium – if Zack Snyder and crew are permitted to
carry through with their vision, I think the results will be very satisfying. My
biggest worry is that, although the first weekend’s box-office seems to have
constituted a success, a combination of accelerating critical drubbing and
general audience mystification at what they just saw will depress subsequent
sales and the film will ultimately be counted a box-office failure because it
does not “live up to studio expectations.” It may have already started. I was
not part of that first extended (Thursday through Sunday) weekend audience
because I felt it would have been a bit unseemly to go see any such movie –
even one that I was so looking forward to – on one of the most holy days of the
Church year, when my attention should be instead on the ineffable sacrifice
that a real God-man made for me. I
did go see it on Monday, however … and was saddened to see that the early
afternoon theatre crowd numbered perhaps eighteen to twenty – if that. I hope I
am wrong and that WB shows faith in its product and allows the ambitious plans
that have been put forth already – out to 2020 or -21, I believe – to play out.
I don’t have much
else to say, except I look forward to seeing the next installment.
Cheers, and Thanks
for reading.
NOTE: Subsequent to writing this, I came upon a profound and touching commentary identifying what was the heart and soul of this movie. It is worth your time viewing. I could not get it to come up on Blogger's embed-video search engine, so here are two versions of the URL:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=rKRmMQaLZz8
https://youtu.be/rKRmMQaLZz8
NOTE: Subsequent to writing this, I came upon a profound and touching commentary identifying what was the heart and soul of this movie. It is worth your time viewing. I could not get it to come up on Blogger's embed-video search engine, so here are two versions of the URL:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=rKRmMQaLZz8
https://youtu.be/rKRmMQaLZz8
No comments:
Post a Comment